On Thu, 11 Jan 2001 16:47:20 -0500 Tim Meneely ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > IWBNI > "It would be nice if" maybe? There, it wasn't so hard :-) > BTW, all of your (Tony) posts in this last batch were duplicated. Weird. I only got one copy here. Maybe a server reset. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- filmscanners: VueScan 6.4.7 Available EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.4.7 Available Geoff Murray
- Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.4.7 Available Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: VueScan 6.4.7 Available Shough, Dean
- Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.4.7 Available EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.4.7 Available Geoffrey McKell
- Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.4.7 Available EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.4.7 Available Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.4.7 Available Tim Meneely
- Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.4.7 Availabl... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.4.7 Available EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.4.7 Available Johnny Deadman
- Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.4.7 Available Michael Moore
- Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.4.7 Available Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.4.7 Available EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.4.7 Available Mike Duncan
- Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.4.7 Available Henry Richardson