I'm glad someone got it! Art Frank Paris wrote: > Sheesh! I think he was kidding! > > Frank Paris > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon >> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 8:12 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: RE: filmscanners: real value? >> >> >> Gee, there are a number of 10-18 screen multiplexes where I live; do they >> count as movie theaters? I have actually gone to see movies in them also; >> but there are many people in my university town who got to see movies in >> these multiplexes every week and throughout the week. They always seem >> crowded. Either they have died a different sort of death than that which I >> am familiar with or I am hallucinating. :-)
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Berry Ives
- Re: filmscanners: Good kit /was real value ... Michael Wilkinson
- Re: filmscanners: Good kit /was real value ... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: real value? B.Rumary
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: real value? Edwin Eleazer
- RE: filmscanners: real value? Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Wolfgang Kraus
- RE: filmscanners: real value? Frank Paris
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: real value? Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Michael Wilkinson
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Arthur Entlich
- filmscanners: Qst: Actual printer resolutio... Jim Rush
- Re: filmscanners: Qst: Actual printer resol... Collin Ong
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Michael Moore
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: real value? Laurie Solomon