>Do you know if he firmware upgrade allows the autofocus to operate when >negatives are scanned, as opposed to the usual operation where only slides >are autofocused and negs are fixed focus? There was little information presented to me other than that Kodak would be in touch with me in the next couple of days to fill in the details of what this beta testing is all about. The RFS allows auto and manual focus for slides at the present. I do not know what direction they will take to improve focusing on negatives. >I'm going through post-purchase cognitive dissonance since I just ordered a >3600. Wondering if I should have gotten a Scan Dual II or Canon 2710, and >used the saved $600 to buy a new monitor....:~( Kodak is quite good about their return policy. Give it a try first and see what you think. Paul >>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<< http://okphoto.webjump.com P:250-498-2800 F:250-498-6876 >>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<
- RE: filmscanners: real value? Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Michael Wilkinson
- RE: filmscanners: real value? Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Michael Wilkinson
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Michael Wilkinson
- Re: Compression: was: filmscanners: real value... Alan Tyson
- Re: filmscanners: Kodak RFS OK Photo
- Re: filmscanners: Kodak RFS Berry Ives
- Re: filmscanners: Kodak RFS Steve Traudt
- Re: filmscanners: Kodak RFS Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Kodak RFS OK Photo
- Re: filmscanners: Kodak RFS Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: real value? Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Berry Ives
- Re: filmscanners: Good kit /was real value ? Michael Wilkinson
- Re: filmscanners: Good kit /was real value ? Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: real value? B.Rumary
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: real value? Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: real value? Edwin Eleazer