In a message dated 2/5/2001 10:00:42 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > How are you going to see ANYTHING on a crappy web image at 72DPI? I do not > believe that would be useful at all. The way this is usually done is to put blown-up examples on the web page along with graphics showing the bit error by subtracting the images. What's needed it simple analysis, not hand waving. Regards, Ed Hamrick
- Re: PSP and 48 bit was Re: fil... Alan Tyson
- Re: PSP and 48 bit was Re: fil... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Henry Richardson
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems WRGill
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems EdHamrick
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Cooke, Julie
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Cooke, Julie
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems EdHamrick
- RE: RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Richard
- RE: RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Frank Paris
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems Cooke, Julie
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems WRGill