Ah, isn't competition wonderful? In advance of the aggrssively-priced Nikon Coolscan 8000 ED, it appears that Polaroid has lopped approx. $1,200 off the suggested list price of their Sprintscan 120. It's now priced at $2,795 rather than the original $3,995. This according to a Polaroid press release coming out of PMA. So, here's the question: With prices now nearly equal, is there a compelling reason to prefer one over the other? I'm eager to get my order in for one of these scanners and am leaning toward the Nikon (ED glass, software bundle, etc) but I may have overlooked something significant that could tilt the balance toward the Polaroid. Any thoughts?
- filmscanners: Beginner's question on which scanner to ch... Armando A. Cottim
- RE: filmscanners: Beginner's question on which scan... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Beginner's question on which scan... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Beginner's question on which scan... patton paul
- Re: filmscanners: Beginner's question on which ... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Beginner's question on which ... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Beginner's question on which scan... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Beginner's question on which scan... Bigboy9955
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Spr... David Freedman
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid... Larry Berman
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Beginner's question on which ... Hersch Nitikman