> output levels and therefore anything that slows down output is avoided. > The amateur, on the other hand, has rarely such a need and usually likes > their equipment to embrace as many functions as possible in a single > product. > This is seen as good value for money, which I would suggest is the case. > He is not likely to be selling his scans for profit and therefore > has little > need for high output of digitised images and is also not likely > to have any > time deadlines to meet. > > Richard Corbett > I think this is the wrong message to send to a representative of a filmscanner manufacturer. Amateurs most definitely want a system that saves time, the moreso the more they have lives outside filmscanning. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
- RE: filmscanners: OT: How to reset... Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: OT: How to reset... Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: OT: How to reset Epso... shAf
- RE: filmscanners: OT: How to reset... Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: OT: How to reset... Michael Wilkinson
- RE: filmscanners: OT: How to reset Epso... Bill Gass
- Re: filmscanners: OT: How to reset Epso... Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: OT: How to reset... Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprints... Gordon Tassi
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 1... Dicky
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprints... Frank Paris
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Spr... Michael Moore
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid... IronWorks
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Pola... Michael Moore
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid... Dicky
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Pola... Michael Moore
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or... Larry Berman
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or... Dicky
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or... Michael Moore
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or... Dicky
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or... Michael Moore