Mike writes ... > I don't think this is right. There is a total 4GB adressable space, > including virtual memory. Some of this is probably reserved for the > operating system, probably reducing the maximum for the > application to 2GB, > I just checked, you are correct ... not 4Gb ... each app is allocated 2Gb (a MIPS throwback). (... reference Minasi's "Mastering Windows 2000 Professional" ...) shAf :o) > > PAUL GRAHAM writes ... > > > I'm planning to get one of the new 4000 dpi medium format > > scanners for my 6x7 negs, ... > > ... > > Got a bit freaked out when I saw that a scan of this size > > in 16 bit is 624 Mb. (8 bit: 312 Mb) > > ... > > > > Mac OS only allows a max of 1Gb Ram to any one program > > (eg Photoshop), does Windows 2000 have similar > > ... > > The memory allocated by Win2k for each program is 4Gb, > which, I believe, includes virtual memory. > > shAf :o) > >
- Re: filmscanners: Arthur Entlich
- filmscanners: Re: Robert E. Wright
- filmscanners: Minolta Scan-Multi software v. Vu... Jeffrey Goggin
- No Subject Tim Atherton
- No Subject PAUL GRAHAM
- filmscanners: Re: Windows 2K RAM limits Rob Geraghty
- filmscanners: RE: Win2k and application RAM shAf
- RE: filmscanners: RE: Win2k and application RAM Mike Finley
- RE: filmscanners: RE: Win2k and application... shAf
- RE: filmscanners: RE: Win2k and applica... Derek Clarke
- RE: filmscanners: RE: Win2k and application... Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: RE: Win2k and applica... Frank Paris
- Re: filmscanners: RE: Win2k and ap... Mark Edmonds
- RE: filmscanners: RE: Win2k an... Mike Finley
- RE: filmscanners: RE: Win2k an... Derek Clarke
- RE: filmscanners: RE: Win2k and application... Frank Paris
- Re: filmscanners: RE: Win2k and application... uoton
- RE: filmscanners: RE: Win2k and applica... Mike Finley
- Re: filmscanners: RE: Win2k and applica... Michael Wilkinson