That was just a figure of speech. Obviously there are many things about the two systems that are absolutely identical. In areas of performance in large hardware configurations and in reliability, aspects of particular interest to filmscanners, 2000 has it all over 98. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of shAf > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 8:40 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2k? Does is manage color like > W98SE? > > > Frank writes ... > > > Windows 2000 is in every way superior. > > > > But it handles color management the same as Win98se ... > > shAf :o)
- Re: filmscanners: I got a Nikon L... EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: I got a Ni... Dale & Gail
- Re: filmscanners: I got a Ni... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: I got a Nikon L... EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: I got a Ni... Alan Shaw
- Re: filmscanners: I got a Ni... IronWorks
- Re: filmscanners: I got a Nikon L... EdHamrick
- filmscanners: Anyone using W... ALLM Rose
- RE: filmscanners: Anyone... Frank Paris
- RE: filmscanners: An... shAf
- RE: filmscanners... Frank Paris
- RE: filmscanners: Anyone... Enoch's Vision, Inc. \(Cary Enoch R...\)
- Re: filmscanners: An... IronWorks
- Re: filmscanners... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmsca... Rob Geraghty
- Re: fil... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmsca... Quoton
- Re: fil... Arthur Entlich
- Re: fil... Quoton
- Re: fil... Roman Kielich®