>2) It will use as much RAM as you can pack on a board. Windows 98 and ME >can't really use more RAM than about 256M effectively, but W2K can go all >the way :-) Can you elaborate on win98's inability to use larger RAM (or refer me to some discussion on this)? Thanks. -- Bob Shomler http://www.shomler.com/gallery.htm
- RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color... Melberg, Rorik
- Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage ... Bigboy9955
- RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is man... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is man... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is man... Derek Clarke
- RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is... Bob Shomler
- RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Doe... Frank Paris
- Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Doe... Derek Clarke
- RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage ... Eli Bowen
- RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Mark Thomas
- Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? IronWorks