I have made hundreds of prints up to 13"x19" with my Epson 2000p and it has
worked flawlessly. I can just tell from the way it sounds that it is a
well-made, precision instrument. I also have an HP 2000C and its photo
quality prints can't begin to compare with the Epson's. Granted, the HP
printer is from a previous generation. The HP has also worked flawlessly and
is a great general purpose printer. The Epson is a dedicated photo printer.

Frank Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of patton paul
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 6:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: filmscanners: RE: Photo quality printers: Hewlett-Packard vs.
> Epson
>
>
> I was wondering if anybody could comment on the relative quality of
> Hewlett-Packard vs. Epson photo quality printers.  I just heard from a
> salesperson at a store that deals in both HP and Epson products that HP
> printers are more trouble-free than Epson.  Does this correspond to the
> experience of people on the list?  The Epson website stresses the
> lightfastness of Epson inks for long lasting prints.  The HP site says
> nothing about this issue.  How do Epson and HP printers compare for the
> longevity of photo prints made with their inks?  HP printers are 4 color,
> Epson printers are 6 color.  Is this difference important?  I just had a
> sample photo print made with an HP printer, and the color quality seems
> excellent.  Are their any other photo quality printer brands that I should
> give serious consideration to besides HP and Epson?
> __________________________________________________________________
> Dr. Paul Patton
> Beckman Institute  Rm 3027  405 N. Mathews St.
> University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign  Urbana, Illinois 61801
> work phone: (217)-265-0795   fax: (217)-244-5180
>
> "The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious.  It is the
> source of all true art and science."
> -Albert Einstein
> __________________________________________________________________
>
>

Reply via email to