I'm not flaming. Linux may be ten times better than Windows 2000 in a
thousand different ways. But it doesn't have critical mass and will never
take over the mainstream.
Frank Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jules
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 11:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: filmscanners: OT: anyone else sick of this? [was Re: Anyone
> using Win2K? Does is manage color like W98SE?]
>
>
> this list is one of the busiest list's i'm on. does it really need
> another flame war?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Frank Paris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 9:49 PM
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like
> W98SE?
>
>
> > Because Windows 2000 IS robust down to the core, and the new consumer
> > version will be based on the same engine. So no, I'm not kidding. And
> they
> > probably are bothered by Linux, the way flies sometimes bother you at
> a
> > picnic.
>
> blah blah blah, etc. etc. etc.
>
>
