At 13:09 22/03/2001 -0500, you wrote: >Has Ed left this list? I hope not. But, please, think for a moment before >you follow Art Entlich's lead in condemning Ed. I wish to defend Art accused of masterminding Ed's departure. There was nothing wrong with Art's statement, I support it fully. We all appreciate Ed's achievement, but please, don't turn this list into a fan club. I read with interest all Ed's postings, but it was obvious, Ed had a commercial interest in participating in the list. Some say, Ed is charging 40 USD only. True, but WE do some marketing for him, we do recommend HIS product. So, I would say, win-win situation.
- filmscanners: Vuescan - Ed Hamrick - Thanks Bob Leonard
- RE: filmscanners: Vuescan - Ed Hamrick - Thanks Cliff Ober
- Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - Ed Hamrick - Thank... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - Ed Hamrick - Thanks Dale & Gail
- Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - Ed Hamrick - Thanks Bob Armstrong
- Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - Ed Hamrick - Thank... Dale & Gail
- Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - Ed Hamrick - T... Stan McQueen
- RE: filmscanners: Vuescan - Ed Hamrick - Thanks Frank Paris
- Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - Ed Hamrick - Thanks Roman Kielich®
- RE: filmscanners: Vuescan - Ed Hamrick - Thanks Frank Parrotta
- Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - Ed Hamrick - Thanks Bill Ross
- RE: filmscanners: Vuescan - Ed Hamrick - Thanks Hemingway, David J
- RE: filmscanners: Vuescan - Ed Hamrick - Thanks Lynn Allen