filmscanners: Re: Scanning dpi and epson papers

[Colin Maddock]

Rob wrote:
>What's worse is that the price lists don't include the gsm or thickness
>of the paper.  That would at least help to separate the "photo weight" papers
>from the "photo quality" but lightweight papers.  Most of the photographers
>aren't at all interested in lightweight papers, I expect.

Rob, why aren't you using Celcast paper? We find it pretty good here, albeit more 
expensive than Epson.

Colin Maddock