>Compared to Vuescan, scratch removal is much better
Ed made some changes to IR cleaning between Vuescan 6.7.5 and the 7.0 series. I find
many instances of incomplete scratch cleaning from LS-30 in 7.x that are completely
removed using 6.7.5. Still true with 7.0.14. I haven't tried Nikonscan 3, since it
reportedly does not deliver hi-bit scan data.
I get around Vuescan's cleaning deficiency by using 6.7.5, but of course would prefer
to use the current release. I sent Ed a note a month ago describing this along with
an example. He replied then that "I'm completely bogged down with some work right now
and can't really look into this for a few weeks." So perhaps when he has time to get
back to this there may be some improvements to Vuescan's IR clean function.
Bob Shomler
www.shomler.com
-----------------
>There was some discussion recently about using the new Nikonscan 3.0 with
>older Nikon scanners. This is my experience with a Coolscan III:-
>The new interface is much better with more controls and the help is at last
>accessable.
>Scans from negs are improved in that the highlights are not being blown out
>as much.
>As has been said bulk scanning crashes, but I've overcome that by using
>Twain in "Thumbs Plus" which works very well. Occasional crashes but I
>assume that's to be expected when using 2 Beta programs in sync
>Compared to Vuescan, scratch removal is much better, skin tones are warmer,
>and healthier looking, colors are more vivid.
>In all thanks to whoever originally brought this to the list
>John Bradbury
