You're very welcome. I'm in no hurry to reinstall NS, either 2.5 or 3.0 Hersch At 03:26 AM 04/28/2001 -0400, you wrote: >In a message dated 4/27/2001 7:43:30 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > I found by > > accident that there is a huge difference between 48-bit 2700 ppi scans on > > my LS-30 (where that should have been more than enough) and 64-bit, 2700 > > ppi settings. > >I looked at the code, and I think I can see the problem. I've added >this to my list of things to fix. Thanks for finding this. > >Regards, >Ed Hamrick
- RE: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII Bob Shomler
- RE: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII Hersch Nitikman
- Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII Douglas Landrum
- Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII Hersch Nitikman
- RE: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII Andreas Kurz
- Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII Dale & Gail
- Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and L... Steve Caspersen
- Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 ... Dale & Gail
- Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan3.0 and LSIII Julian Robinson