Michael wrote: >Rob writes ... >> Someone mentioned Supra 400. I wish someone would produce >> a 100 ASA print film optimised for scanning! > Supra 100 (!?) It's been claimed here that only Supra 400 is a new formulaiton specifically optimised for scanning. Supra 100 is apparently a previous emulsion rebadged? As far as apparent grain in sky is concerned, I haven't found Supra 100 to have any advantage over Fuji Superia 100 and the Fuji film is LOTS cheaper. Rob Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wordweb.com
- Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanner... JFMahony91
- Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new sc... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new sc... Thorn Roby
- Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new sc... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in ne... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- RE: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides i... Vladislav Jurco
- RE: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slid... JimD
- Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs.... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Negatives... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Negatives... shAf
- Re: filmscanners: Negatives... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Negatives... Edwin Eleazer
- Re: filmscanners: Negatives... Tom Scales
- Re: filmscanners: Negatives... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Negatives... Tom Scales
- filmscanners: list archives... Acer V
- Re: filmscanners: list arch... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: list arch... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Negatives... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slid... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs.... Rob Geraghty