"Harry Lehto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The original slide are good with no apparent ghosts. They were actually > taken with 50mm and 300mm camera lenses. Checked with a good slide > projector and separately with a microscope that the originals are OK. OK, it sounds like some sort of aberration in the scanner lens system. Is there anyone near you with another film scanner you could send a sample slide to in order to test it? Maybe with a Polaroid scanner? Out of interest, does it make any difference if you insert the slide into the scanner the other way up? Rob
- filmscanners: Stellar ghosts and Nikon Coolscan IVED (LS40... Harry Lehto
- Re: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts and Nikon Coolscan I... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts and Nikon Coolscan I... Harry Lehto
- Re: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts and Nikon Coolsc... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts and Nikon Co... Harry Lehto
- Re: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts and Niko... Steve Greenbank
- RE: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts and Niko... shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts and... Harry Lehto
- filmscanners: the "Lehto&qu... shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts... Julian Robinson
- Re: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts... Herm
- Re: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts and Nikon Coolsc... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts and Nikon Coolscan I... Ryan K. Brooks