"Harry Lehto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The original slide are good with no apparent ghosts. They were actually > taken with 50mm and 300mm camera lenses. Checked with a good slide > projector and separately with a microscope that the originals are OK. Did you try the test yet where you reduce the CCD exposure? I still think this will fix the problem. Regards, Ed Hamrick
- filmscanners: the "Lehto&quo... shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts ... Julian Robinson
- Re: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts ... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts ... Herm
- Re: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts and Nikon Coolsca... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts and Nikon Coolscan IVE... Ryan K. Brooks
- Re: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts and Nikon Coolscan IVE... EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts and Nikon Coolsca... Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts and Nikon Coolscan IVE... Hemingway, David J
- Re: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts and Nikon Coolscan IVE... EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts and Nikon Coolscan IVE... EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts and Nikon Coolscan IVE... Roger Smith
- Re: filmscanners: Stellar ghosts and Nikon Coolscan IVE... Lynn Allen