On Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:33:06 -0400 Todd Radel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I > do not have another ICE scanner to compare it with, so I cannot evaluate > Tony's comment that the Acer does an inferior job. ICE at a reasonable price > was the main reason I bought this model. Sorry, I have no direct (test) evidence about this, and it appears a prejudicial comment. Whether qualitatively inferior to other implementations of ICE (as some have said), I don't know, but the extra pass for IR is slower. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- filmscanners: AcerScanwit Richard Starr
- Re: filmscanners: AcerScanwit Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: AcerScanwit Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: AcerScanwit Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: AcerScanwit Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: AcerScanwit Todd Radel
- Re: filmscanners: AcerScanwit Collin Ong
- Re: filmscanners: AcerScanwit Todd Radel
- Re: filmscanners: AcerScanwit Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: AcerScanwit Todd Radel
- Re: filmscanners: AcerScanw... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: AcerS... Todd Radel
- Re: filmscanners: AcerScanwit Mark T.
- RE: filmscanners: AcerScanwit Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: AcerScanwit Richard Starr
- Re: filmscanners: AcerScanwit Collin Ong
- Re: filmscanners: AcerScanwit Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: AcerScanwit Lynn Allen
- RE: filmscanners: AcerScanwit Honda Lo