on 5/19/01 8:30 AM, Steve Greenbank at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > See this : > > http://www.robgalbraith.com/diginews/2001-05/2001_05_17_dcs_760.html > > and in particular this : (be warned it's 1.4M) > > http://www.robgalbraith.com/public_files/dcs760_bw_portrait.jpg well, it's very very sharp and grain free. but the tonality is HIDEOUS. It looks like a grab from a video picture. Look at the highlights on the hair. Agh. Is this progress? run! very fast! in the opposite direction! I could do substantially better with my super speed graphic, a 50 year old lens, some APX 100 and a jug of Xtol. tone! tone! tone! obviously that camera can do a bazillion wunnerful things but film has a few tricks up its sleeve yet methinks. -- John Brownlow http://www.pinkheadedbug.com
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding Richard
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding Bob Shomler
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbeddi... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatb... Karl Schulmeisters
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbeddi... Alan Tyson
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatb... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. F... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. F... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning ... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatb... Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. F... Johnny Deadman
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning ... Richard N. Moyer
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscann... Johnny Deadman
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscann... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding Douglas Landrum
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding Gordon Tassi
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding Lynn Allen