Jeffrey writes ... > >I suppose I am with Lynn ... afterall, whether you use Vuescan to > >crop, or not, it still scans the entire frame, simply delivering > >what's within the area to the "cropped" file. > > The problem is the little slivers of black border that are left cause it to > calculate the scan exposure incorrectly. To avoid this, I have to crop the > image ever so slightly and Vuescan's cropping tool makes this inconvenient. Wouldn't the Vuescan "buffer" variable solve this problem ... leastwize, I thought that it was its purpose ... set it once ... don't worry about the exposure again(?) shAf :o)
- filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is driving me nuts Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is driving me nuts Jeffrey Goggin
- re: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is driving me nuts Alan Womack
- Re: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is driving me nuts EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is driving me ... Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is driving me nuts Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is driving me ... shAf
- Re: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is driving... Jeffrey Goggin
- Re: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is dri... shAf
- Re: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is dri... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is driving me ... Colin Maddock
- Re: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is driving me nuts Joel Wilcox
- Re: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is driving me ... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is driving... John Matturri
- Re: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is driving... Richard N. Moyer
- Re: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is dri... Larry Berman
- Re: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is dri... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan i... Julian Robinson
- Re: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is driving... Julian Robinson