"Tom Christiansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the advantage of 2880dpi lengthwise compared to 1440dpi? >From what I've seen it means less visible dithering and the result is closer to a photographic continuous tone. > Some people claim that you shouldn't send pictures to the printer using max > resolution as this uses too much ink. What's your opinion on this? It probably does use a lot of ink. Decent results can be achieved on a 1290 even at 720dpi on the driver due to the 6 inks. But the best result will be at 2880. Rob
- Re: filmscanners: [OT] Olympus P-400 printer ??? Arthur Entlich
- Re(2): filmscanners: [OT] Olympus P-400 printer ??? Raymond Carles
- OT Epsons again was Re: filmscanners: [OT] Olympus ... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: [OT] Olympus P-400 printer ??? Marvin Demuth
- Re: filmscanners: [OT] Which printer: was Olymp... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: [OT] Olympus P-400 printer ??? Ira Beckoff
- filmscanners: [OT] Epson printers (Was: Olympus ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: filmscanners: [OT] Epson printers (Was: ... Johnny Deadman
- Re: filmscanners: [OT] Epson printers (Was: ... James Hill
- Re: filmscanners: [OT] Epson printers (W... Arthur Entlich
- filmscanners: Apologies Rob Geraghty
- filmscanners: Apologies Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: [OT] Olympus P-400 printer ??? Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: [OT] Olympus P-400 printer ??? John C. Jernigan
- Re: filmscanners: [OT] Olympus P-400 printer ??... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: [OT] Olympus P-400 printer ??? James Hill