On Sun, 17 Jun 2001 18:14:50 Mikael Risedal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > There are something else with VueScan just now if I compare VueScan to > NikonScan and Silverfast. Little bit flat, doll and color less. Yes, I see low saturation too with VS+SS4000. Doesn't bother me personally as I always scan to 16bit and work with the image in PS. I would far prefer saturation to be on the low side rather than too high on occasions, as that could be disastrous. Typically VS images need about +35 saturation here. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- Re: filmscanners: Skin tones Mikael Risedal
- Re: filmscanners: Skin tones John Bradbury
- Re: filmscanners: Skin tones Mikael Risedal
- filmscanners: Skin tones Mikael Risedal
- Re: filmscanners: Skin tones John Bradbury
- Re: filmscanners: Skin tones Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Skin tones Mikael Risedal
- Re: filmscanners: Skin tones Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Skin tones Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Skin tones EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: Skin tones Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Skin tones John Bradbury
- Re: filmscanners: Skin tones Mikael Risedal
- Re: filmscanners: Skin tones Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Skin tones John Bradbury
- Re: filmscanners: Skin tones Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Skin tones Terry Carroll
- Re: filmscanners: Skin tones John Bradbury