> Take a look at the Leafscan 45 sample vs. the Nikon ED 4000 about halfway > down the page at this site: > > http://www.pytlowany.com/nikontest.html > > To me, the difference is astonishing, as if the Nikon image were viewed > through a veil of haze, while the Leafscan is clear. > > Is this the effect of greater resolution? Or can the Nikon scan be > corrected in Photo Shop somehow to look as clear (can't think of a better > word) as the Leafscan's? What you're seeing is mostly a difference in contrast and black levels. The Nikon scan has a lot more shadow detail. If you were to cut off the bottom 5% or so of the Nikon black values to match that of the Leaf scan, they'd look similar in tonal values.
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scan... Shough, Dean
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scan... Alessandro Pardi
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks... Raphael Bustin
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP s... Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: B... rafeb
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (wa... Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolutio... Dan Honemann
- filmscanners: RE: filmscanners:... Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscann... Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resol... Moreno Polloni
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resol... Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Scanner resol... Moreno Polloni
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resol... Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Scanner resol... rafeb
- Re: filmscanners: Scanner resol... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Scanner resol... Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: Scanner resol... Dave King
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resol... rafeb
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resol... Dan Honemann
- Re: filmscanners: Scanner resol... Dave King