Stan McQueen wrote: > > I thought the same, but I recently read a column in one of the photo > mags (forget which one) in which it was stated that Kodak does consider > a one-stop push of Ektachrome 200 to be ASA 320. The author said that if > you shoot at 400, you should tell the lab that rather than telling them > to push it one stop. > > Stan > ======================================= > Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com OK, it now appears Kodak is rewriting terms, we're no longer taking "stops" we are talking "K"-pushes ;-) Art
- filmscanners: Best film for scanning with FS 2710 Kim Stewart
- Re: filmscanners: Best film for scanning with FS 27... Kim Stewart
- Re: filmscanners: Best film for scanning with F... Sam A. McCandless
- Re: filmscanners: Best film for scanning with FS 27... Joel Wilcox
- Re: filmscanners: Best film for scanning with F... Herm
- Re: filmscanners: Best film for scanning wi... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Best film for scannin... Johnny Deadman
- Re: filmscanners: Best film for sc... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Best film for scannin... Stan McQueen
- Re: filmscanners: Best film for sc... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Best film for scannin... Herm
- Re: filmscanners: Best film for scanning with F... Herm
- Re: filmscanners: Best film for scanning with FS 27... Joel Wilcox
- Re: filmscanners: Best film for scanning with FS 27... Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Best film for scanning with FS 27... Lynn Allen
- filmscanners: bracketing neg film was: Best fil... Isaac Crawford
- Re: filmscanners: Best film for scanning with F... Herm
- Re: filmscanners: Best film for scanning wi... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Best film for scanning with FS 27... Joel Wilcox