On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:25:14 -0400 (EDT) Raphael Bustin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > 645 negatives take about five minutes, more or > less, with ICE turned off. This is a rough > guess, I haven't actually timed it. Certainly > no more time than it took my Epson 1640SU to do > the same job. Not bad considering the vast filesize. > Scanning 35 mm is proportionally faster. Sounds similar to the Polaroid/Mtek 4000 Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- Re: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP s... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks ... Shough, Dean
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks ... Dan Honemann
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP s... rafeb
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: B... Lawrence Smith
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (wa... rafeb
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution... Lawrence Smith
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resol... Raphael Bustin
- Re: filmscanners: Scanner r... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks ... Richard
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks ... Shough, Dean
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks ... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks ... Shough, Dean