On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Lawrence Smith wrote: > Rafe, > > What are your other settings for the 5 minute scans? I find that a 16x > multisample, 14bit, ICE normal scan of a 645 transpanency takes about 20-25 > mintues.... Well, for starters, I'm not using multi-sampling, and I'm only using 24 bit (vs. 42 bit) color. Do you see a real benefit to multi-sampling? I haven't played with the 14-bit color yet. Not sure if there's any major benefit, and of course the downside is 2x the size of these already huge image files. (The other issue here is that I still prefer to work in Photoshop 4, where the support is very limited for 48-bit color.) rafe b.
- filmscanners: A GOOD nikon 8000 scan... Lawrence Smith
- Re: filmscanners: A GOOD nikon 8000 scan... rafeb
- RE: filmscanners: A GOOD nikon 8000 scan... Lawrence Smith
- filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED Banding rafeb
- filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED Bandin... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED Ba... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED Banding Arthur Entlich
- filmscanners: Nikon 8000: An Unbiased Review rafeb
- RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000: An Unbiased Review Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000: An Unbiased Review Lawrence Smith
- filmscanners: Request for "unbiased review"... Raphael Bustin
- filmscanners: Request for "unbiased review"... Victor Landweber