At 01:54 PM 6/28/01 +0930, Mark T. wrote: >Interesting, but couldn't *also* help but notice the page on the Minolta >Dimage 7 digital camera. >5.2 Mp, lens equivalent to a 28-200, and US$1499. > >Those specs & numbers are beginning to sound almost interesting, even to a >skinflint like me... Oh, indeed. I think digital cameras are closing fast on 35 mm format. In another year or two there really won't be any reason left to shoot 35 mm film. But *real* progress still hinges on larger CCD or CMOS sensors, and that will be expensive, at least in the short term. rafe b.
- filmscanners: New: Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO Film Scann... Shough, Dean
- Re: filmscanners: New: Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO F... Moreno Polloni
- Re: filmscanners: New: Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi P... Larry Berman
- Re: filmscanners: New: Minolta DiMAGE Scan Mul... Robert Meier
- Re: filmscanners: New: Minolta DiMAGE Scan... Larry Berman
- Re: filmscanners: New: Minolta DiMAGE Scan Mul... Moreno Polloni
- Re: filmscanners: New: Minolta DiMAGE Scan... Walter Bushell
- Re: filmscanners: New: Minolta DiMAGE Scan Mul... Todd Radel
- RE: filmscanners: New: Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO F... laurie
- RE: filmscanners: Minolta DiMAGE Scan & Dimage... Mark T.
- Re: filmscanners: Minolta DiMAGE Scan & Di... rafeb
- Re: filmscanners: Minolta DiMAGE Scan &... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Minolta DiMAGE Scan... Walter Bushell
- Re: filmscanners: Minolta DiMAGE ... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Minolta DiM... Walter Bushell
- Re: filmscanners: Minolta DiM... Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: Minolta DiM... Frank Nichols
- RE: filmscanners: Minolta DiM... rafeb
- Re: filmscanners: Minolta DiM... Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Grain alias... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Grain alias... Dave King