On Fri, 6 Jul 2001 15:50:48 -0400 Wilson, Paul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > The Nikon does seem marginally sharper but the Polaroid seems to have = > better > shadow detail (lower right side of the uncropped shot). It's hard to tell, since exposure and contrast vary between the two - the Polaroid looks just slightly 'hot' and magenta. Both should be easily correctable. The Nikon does look to have a slight sharpness advantage, but whether this is maintained across the frame seems to be a matter of much debate. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000ED Frank Nichols
- RE: filmscanners: Nikon 80... rafeb
- RE: filmscanners: Nikon 80... Julian Robinson
- Re: filmscanners: Niko... Peter Marquis-Kyle
- Re: filmscanners: ... Walter Bushell
- Re: filmscann... Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Niko... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: ... Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscann... Tony Sleep
- RE: films... Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000ED Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000ED Mikael Risedal
- RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000ED Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000ED Mikael Risedal
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000ED Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 80... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Niko... Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)
- Re: filmscanners: ... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscann... Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)
- Re: films... Arthur Entlich
- Re: films... Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)