"Jim Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It was probably still dust. A lack of cleanliness in a photolab is terminal > for an image. Occassionally, you can resoak the negtive/slide in a Photoflo > type solution and gently remove debris, but at high risk. I'll stick with spotting in PSP. :) FWIW the IR channel in the raw file appears to be blank - *utterly* blank. I've never seen that before. So I'll have to try scanning it again and see if it was a temporary aberration with Vuescan. Rob
- filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: When if Provia 100F a ... Rob Geraghty
- filmscanners: Polaroid under major financial probl... Andrea de Polo
- Re: filmscanners: Polaroid under major financi... Raphael Bustin
- Re: filmscanners: Polaroid under major fin... James L. Sims
- filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: When is Provia 100F a poor ... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: When is Provia 100... Gordon Tassi
- filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: When is Provia 100... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: When is Pr... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: When i... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: When is Provia... Jim Snyder
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: When is Pr... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: When i... Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: W... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: When is Provia 100... Arthur Entlich