Norman Quinn wrote: > Hand baggage, but it was checked about 8 times. > I did not expose the film on the trip. It was > exposed when I returned to Jamaica. I'd guess this could make the problem worse since taking the photos was trying to add an image to a film that was already exposed by the Xrays. I imagine there would be more image surviving the experience if the Xrays were "overexposing" film with an existing latent image? Anyone with more knowledge of chemistry care to comment? Rob Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wordweb.com
- Re: filmscanners: fogged film Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: fogged film Norman Quinn
- Re: filmscanners: fogged film Robert Meier
- Re: filmscanners: fogged film Norman Quinn
- Re: filmscanners: fogged film Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: fogged film Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: fogged film Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: fogged film Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: fogged film Norman Quinn
- Re: filmscanners: fogged film Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: fogged film Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: fogged film Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: fogged film Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: fogged film Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: fogged film Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: fogged film Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: fogged film Tony Sleep
- filmscanners: Monitors: Shadow Mask or Aperture Gr... Robert Kehl
- RE: filmscanners: Monitors: Shadow Mask or Ape... Jawed Ashraf