> >1. Has anybody tested this? How good is it? > > >Yes. See: > >http://www.channel1.com/users/rafeb/scanner_test2.htm > >It's not 1600 dpi, I'm fairly sure. But it's >the best you're going to find for $250 -- of >that I'm fairly certain. > > >and 2. Does VueScan support it? > >Yes. > > >rafe b. Thanks, Rafe. I took a look at your comparisons. I'm sure it's better than my old Microtek ScanMaker X6 which is all I currently have for scanning MF. I'll let you know more after I get it. Stan ======================================= Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com
- Re: filmscanners: 1640SU @CompUSA ... Terry Carroll
- Re: filmscanners: 1640SU @CompUSA ... Jim Snyder
- Re: filmscanners: 1640SU @CompUSA $150 Stan McQueen
- Re: filmscanners: 1640SU @CompUSA $150 rafeb
- Re: filmscanners: 1640SU @CompUSA $150 James L. Sims
- Re: filmscanners: 1640SU @CompUSA $150 Stan McQueen
- RE: filmscanners: 1640SU @CompUSA $150 Harlee Little
- RE: filmscanners: 1640SU @CompUSA $150 Stan McQueen
- Re: filmscanners: 1640SU @CompUSA ... James L. Sims
- RE: filmscanners: 1640SU @CompUSA ... rafeb
- Re: filmscanners: 1640SU @CompUSA $150 Stan McQueen
- Re: filmscanners: 1640SU @CompUSA $150 Kevin Power