"Lawrence Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "As my prints sell for hundreds of $ they need to be perfect." Preston wonders: If your scans need to be perfect, why are you trying to scan them on a $3,000 scanner? Send them out to someone who has a high-end drum scanner or even a high-end flat-bed (like a Scitex Eversmart). Those scans will be "perfect". There is a reason why some scanners cost $500, some cost $3,000, and why some cost $30,000. You don't really think that these three price-level scanners give the same quality, do you? If your prints sell for "hundreds of $", then $30 to $50 for a high-end scan can't be too expensive. Preston Earle, who is now ducking. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- I've known lots of trouble in my life, most of which never happened.---Mark Twain
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon Service Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon Service Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon Service Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon Service Tony Sleep
- filmscanners: My replacement 8000 is bandin... Lawrence Smith
- Re: filmscanners: My replacement 8000 i... Marcin M. Nagraba
- RE: filmscanners: My replacement 8... Lawrence Smith
- filmscanners: Link to Nikon 8000 bandin... Lawrence Smith
- RE: filmscanners: Link to Nikon 80... Jawed Ashraf
- RE: filmscanners: Link to Nikon 80... Lawrence Smith
- RE: filmscanners: Link to Nikon 80... Preston Earle
- RE: filmscanners: Link to Nikon 80... Lawrence Smith
- Re: filmscanners: Link to Nikon 80... Preston Earle
- RE: filmscanners: Link to Nikon 80... Lawrence Smith
- RE: filmscanners: Link to Nikon 80... Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Link to Nikon 80... Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: Link to Nikon 80... Jawed Ashraf
- RE: filmscanners: Link to Nikon 80... Lawrence Smith
- RE: filmscanners: Link to Nikon 80... Jawed Ashraf
- RE: filmscanners: Link to Nikon 80... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Link to Nikon 80... Austin Franklin