Fantastic comparisons, Rafe. And much more "Real Life" than anything from 
the mfgrs' publicity departments. Thanks.


>From: rafeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: filmscanners: On A More Positive Note
>Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 23:11:04 -0400
>
>I've posted a few small scans from my 8000 ED at:
>
>http://www.channel1.com/users/rafeb/scanner_test4.htm
>
>(Photos of shed, and snow-covered boats.)
>
>These might explain why some of us are pretty
>excited about this machine, in spite of all the
>negative talk 'round here.
>
>This was a totally uncorrected scan, at 1x scanning,
>no ICE, no nothin'.  I let the scanner auto-expose the
>negative, and did no further image adjustments in
>Photoshop.  As raw a scan as you can get.
>
>There are several other scans (from different
>scanners) on this page, so please be patient while
>it all loads.
>
>There are links to additional sample scans, from
>several other film scanners, at the bottom of the
>page.  (Eg. Epson 1640 SU, for those considering
>the super-duper CompUSA sale price this week.)
>
>
>rafe b.
>
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

Reply via email to