Lynn wrote: > Hoo, boy, that *would* be useful! Presently, every definition is > about a half-click away from the next guy's definition. If I had > a website, I'd give it a go (I've got *plenty* of examples!)-- > maybe some kind-sprited, web-savvy member will do it? I'd be happy to put things online provided the examples are appropriately sized. I already have a page about scanning to explain the work which was being done on looking at film types. It would be good to have examples of things which are problematic about scanning. Rob Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wordweb.com
- Re: filmscanners: image samples o... Lynn Allen
- RE: filmscanners: image samp... Dan Honemann
- RE: filmscanners: image ... Robert Meier
- RE: filmscanners: im... Dan Honemann
- filmscanners: RE: filmsc... Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: image ... rafeb
- Re: filmscanners: im... Bob Kehl - Kvernstoen, Kehl & Assoc.
- Re: filmscanners: image samp... Lynn Allen
- RE: filmscanners: image ... Frank Nichols
- RE: filmscanners: im... Mark T.
- RE: filmscanners: image ... Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: image samp... Lynn Allen
- RE: filmscanners: image samp... Lynn Allen
- RE: filmscanners: image ... rafeb
- filmscanners: RE: fi... Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: im... Dan Honemann
- RE: filmscanners: image ... Dan Honemann
- Re: filmscanners: image samp... John Matturri
- RE: filmscanners: image samp... Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: image samp... Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: image samp... Tony Sleep