At 02:16 AM 7/22/2001 -0500, you wrote: > >It's a little hard to tell from your post, but I'm assuming that you are > >not arguing in opposition to registering the copyright on one's images. > >Correct. Then what are you arguing about? And why? I'm concerned that the effect of your argument will be to convince people that it is not worthwhile to go to the effort of registering their images. That would not be a Good Thing would it? Stan ======================================= Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com
- filmscanners: Digital Copyright Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Copyright Stan McQueen
- RE: filmscanners: Digital Copyright LAURIE SOLOMON
- RE: filmscanners: Digital Copyright Stan McQueen
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Copyright Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Digital Copyright LAURIE SOLOMON
- RE: filmscanners: Digital Copyright Lynn Allen
- RE: filmscanners: Digital Copyright LAURIE SOLOMON
- RE: filmscanners: Digital Copyright Stan McQueen
- RE: filmscanners: Digital Copyright Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Copyright Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: Digital Copyright Stan McQueen
- filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Digital Copyright Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Digital Copyright LAURIE SOLOMON
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Copyright Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: Digital Copyright Laurie Solomon