In a message dated 08/09/2001 8:22:14 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << The second Dimage Scan has fewer bad elements, but it appears to suffer from a wide area of miscalibrated elements. I am still trying to determine if this problem is due to the calibration routine failing sometimes, which might, in part be a software problem. >> Like I said, I'm *sure* I don't know what I'm doing (yet?)! The only thing I noticed so far is a print with a deep blue sky and no clouds had a faint "wavy" look to it (I don't even know the terminology!!). From what I've read on this list blues are tough so I'm hoping this *may* be expected for a blue sky. Are you going to send back your second SDII, Art? Ed
- filmscanners: Shadows and Scanwit 2720s GeoffreyJakarta
- Re: filmscanners: Shadows and Scanwit 2720s Mark T.
- Re: filmscanners: Shadows and Scanwit 2720s Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Shadows and Scanwit 2720s Bigboy9955
- Re: filmscanners: Shadows and Scanwit 2720s Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Shadows and Scanwit 2720s Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Shadows and Scanwit 2720s images
- Re: filmscanners: Shadows and Scanwit 2720s Bigboy9955
- Re: filmscanners: Shadows and Scanwit 2720s Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Shadows and Scanwit 2720s Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Shadows and Scanwit 2720s Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Shadows and Scanwit 2720s Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Shadows and Scanwit 2720s Bigboy9955
- Re: filmscanners: Shadows and Scanwit 2720s Bigboy9955