Rob writes: > I tried printing it, but the print looks like > the screen - not like the slide. That's how it is supposed to look. When you get the screen to look like the slide, the print will come out looking like the slide as well. > Having said that, what you say about RGB and > turquoise would presumably apply to the scanner > itself. The scanner could have gamut limitations. Still, I don't see why turquoise would be particularly hard to pick up, especially when scanners usually do well with much more complex colors, such as skin tones. I don't think I saw the start of this thread: What type of film is this, and which scanner?
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Why not sRGB ? Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Why not sRGB ? Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Why not sRGB ? Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Why not sRGB ? Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Why not sRG... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Why not sRG... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Why not sRGB ? Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Why not sRG... Robert E. Wright
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Why not sRG... Colin Maddock
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Why not sRGB ? Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Why not sRGB ? Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Why not sRG... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Why not sRGB ? Lynn Allen