Arthur writes: > Knowing Gates, it is all a money decision and they > likely already scanned the "best" (most sellable) > images ... It sounds like you don't know Gates at all. If he just wanted to make lots of money, buying something like a deteriorating archive of images would be a really poor way to do it. Besides, he already has more money than he could ever spend, so why would he want to waste any of his time making more? His main limitation these days, as he has pointed out himself, is limited _time_, not limited money. > Gates also owns several other collections from > Europe, which unfortunately are also disintegrating. They would be disintegrating just as fast if he didn't own them.
- Re: filmscanners: Best digit... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Best digital ar... Hersch Nitikman
- Re: filmscanners: Best digital ar... Ron Carlson
- Re: filmscanners: Best digit... David Gordon
- Re: filmscanners: Best digital ar... Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: Best digit... Hersch Nitikman
- Re: filmscanners: Best digital ar... Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Best digital ar... Karl Schulmeisters
- Re: filmscanners: Best digit... Bob Kehl - Kvernstoen, Kehl & Assoc.
- Re: filmscanners: Best digital ar... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Best digital ar... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Best digit... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Best digital ar... Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Best digital ar... Karl Schulmeisters
- Re: filmscanners: Best digital ar... Dale R. Reed
- Re: filmscanners: Best digital ar... Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Best digital ar... Thys
- Re: filmscanners: Best digit... Mike Duncan
- Re: filmscanners: Best digital ar... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Best digital ar... Thys
- Re: filmscanners: Best digital ar... Bob Kehl - Kvernstoen, Kehl & Assoc.