Moreno wrote: >It's equally useful for both slides and negs. ICE doesn't do much that you >can't do manually in Photoshop. It certainly isn't necessary, but the main >reason for ICE, IMO, is to save time. And it does save alot of time. Even >if you only scan a few slides per day, ICE will save you hours per week. Amen to that. I *always* use Infrared dust removal in Vuescan with my LS30 and it saves a huge amount of time scanning. It takes long enough to get the curves, levls, colours, contrast etc right. I can do without spotting as well! Rob Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wordweb.com
- filmscanners: Do I need Digital ICE? & Scanner se... dbdors
- RE: filmscanners: Do I need Digital ICE? & S... Gordon Potter
- filmscanners: Do I need Digital ICE? & Scann... dbdors
- RE: filmscanners: Do I need Digital ICE? & S... Hemingway, David J
- Re: filmscanners: Do I need Digital ICE? & S... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Do I need Digital ICE? & S... Darrell Dorsey
- Re: filmscanners: Do I need Digital ICE? &am... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Do I need Digital ICE? & S... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Do I need Digital ICE? & S... Moreno Polloni
- Re: filmscanners: Do I need Digital ICE? &am... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Do I need Digital ICE? & S... Herm