>at 200 MHz isn't fast enough to run a new OS. > >It would take several months and thousands of dollars to do all this, during >which I'd be without a PC for home or business use, which would cause my >business to fail. > >Obviously, none of this is acceptable, so I won't be buying a LS-4000. The LS40 (IV ED) is close to the LS-4000 and requires USB and half the RAM of the LS-4000. Mike Duncan
- RE: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! LAURIE SOLOMON
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Steven N. Norvich
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! rlb
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! David Hoffman
- RE: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Jack Phipps
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Winsor Crosby
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! JFMahony91
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Mike Duncan
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Pat Perez
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Gordon Potter