>I never claimed their examples had any aesthetic quality, but I do think the >software appears to be pretty impressive. > >Save image 25 or 26 and see if you can get anywhere near the processed >example they show you. > >Steve I admit it is amazing what it does, especially in the saving of images of subjects outside the dynamic range of the picture taking system. 25 and 26 are amazing for creating a picture out of nothing. My reaction was that some of the "befores" were much more pleasing than the "afters". Spy cam clarity at any cost is not always the best way to go. My other reaction was the question, "Who is this for?" If by some momentary lapse, mini-stroke, or fainting spell someone should produce one of the before pictures, most, on this list, would probably just toss it as they went through the pictures in their hospital bed. Would you have really pushed the shutter button with 25 or 26 in your viewfinder? Winsor -- Winsor Crosby Long Beach, California
- filmscanners: New auto adjust software on it's way Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: New auto adjust software on it'... Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: New auto adjust software on it'... Winsor Crosby
- Re: filmscanners: New auto adjust software on it'... Denise E. Kissinger
- Re: filmscanners: New auto adjust software on it'... Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: New auto adjust software on... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: New auto adjust software on it'... Winsor Crosby
- Re: filmscanners: New auto adjust software on it'... Steve Greenbank
- Re: Re: filmscanners: New auto adjust software on... markthomasz
- Re: Re: filmscanners: New auto adjust softwar... Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: New auto adjust software on it'... Preston Earle
- Re: filmscanners: New auto adjust software on it'... John Matturri
- Re: filmscanners: New auto adjust software on... Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: New auto adjust software on it'... Shough, Dean
- RE: filmscanners: New auto adjust software on it'... Jawed Ashraf