> > That's a load of hooey. C-41, or E-6 can look > > entirely different depending on development. > > They always look the same in my experience, no matter what lab > develops them. Then either you are using labs of identical grade, or the methodology of use you partake in does not show the differences, or lastly, you aren't able to distinguish the differences (that's not meant insultingly). I see clear differences between my C-41/E-6 development, my pro labs development and my corner mini-lab (yes, they really are on a corner).
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Hersch Nitikman
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging SKID Photography
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Hersch Nitikman
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging SKID Photography
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging SKID Photography
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Pat Perez
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Ron Carlson
- RE: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging LAURIE SOLOMON
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging LAURIE SOLOMON
- RE: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging LAURIE SOLOMON