Austin writes: > Anthony, you did not read what I wrote. I said > "you are, obviously, right". Doesn't that close > the discussion? I read what you wrote, but it appeared to be sarcasm.
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Lawrence Smith
- RE: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Steve Caspersen
- RE: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Pat Perez
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging David Gordon
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Lawrence Smith
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Pat Perez
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Pat Perez
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging Jim Snyder