> Austin writes: > > > High resolution, such as 1280x1024 and higher > > has been around for 20 years. > > I said _average_ resolution, not _maximum_ resolution. Yes, I was talking average resolution, that's why what you said was wrong. The average resolution of Sun and SGI etc. workstations has easily been in the neighborhood of 1280x1024.
- RE: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images SKID Photography
- RE: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images Johnny Deadman
- RE: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images SKID Photography
- Re: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images Jim Snyder