Well, I do agree multipass scanning has many problems and using it to overcome the limitations of a scanner is clearly a bad idea. Get a better scanner <g>. Tom From: "Hemingway, David J" > Tom, > The review in this Octobers MacWorld showed the same result as the review a > year and a half ago. The Polaroid scanner gets at least as good shadow > detail in a single pass as the competitors model with a 16X multiscan. Using > multiscanning to get increased shadow detail can also cause other negative > effects to the image, primarily softness. We have seen this in our work to > implement multi-scanning for Polaroid scanners and it is not easy to > overcome.
- Re: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000? Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000? Barbara & Martin Greene
- Re: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000? Barbara & Martin Greene
- Re: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000... Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000? Steve Greenbank
- RE: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000? Hemingway, David J
- Re: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000... Tom Scales
- RE: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000? Hemingway, David J
- RE: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000... Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000... Tom Scales
- Re: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000? Stan McQueen
- Re: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000? jimhayes
- RE: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000... Cliff Ober
- Re: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000? Karl Schulmeisters
- Re: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000? RogerMillerPhoto
- RE: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000? Jack Phipps
- Re: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000? Barbara & Martin Greene
- Re: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000? Barbara & Martin Greene
- RE: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000? Gregory Georges
- RE: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000? Austin Franklin