> The new Minolta Multi Pro is one of those machines with different > resolutions for different format. I'd be VERY careful believing any of the dynamic range specs from that scanner. It's probably pretty good, but I doubt it is any better than any of the others that are 14 bits. >From what they have on their web site, comparing 14 bit to 16 bit, is, in my opinion, entirely misleading and erroneous. If anyone wants me to go into detail, I'd be happy to ;-)
- filmscanners: Nikon 8000/ digital ICE, was: Scanner Buying... PAUL GRAHAM
- RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000/ digital ICE, was: Scann... Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000/ digital ICE, was: Scann... Jack Phipps
- RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000/ digital ICE PAUL GRAHAM
- RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000/ digital ICE, was: S... Mike Duncan
- RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000/ digital ICE, wa... Jawed Ashraf
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000/ digital ICE, was: Scann... Mikael Risedal