Thanks for that Petru - I must have missed that wonderful Tony Sleep contribution :)
I too have grave doubts about the Imaging Resource reviews - as Tony says, their comments about never having seen a >2800 dpi scanner and the fact that they were seemingly unaware of grain-aliasing until recently, makes me take their reviews with, er, a large dose of salts.. :) My own ability to extract a good scan has increased in leaps and bounds over the last 2 years so I am very wary of reading into sample scans, even if they are by 'experts'. I reckon you have to use a scanner for quite a while and work hard at extracting the absolute maximum before you can claim to be getting it 'all'. I guess I am now such a cynic I won't believe anybody..! mark t Petru said: > I wouldn't rely too much on imaging-resource's > scanner reviews.... <snip> > PS: if you would like to have a good laugh, see Tony Sleep's message.. > http://www.mail-archive.com/filmscanners%40halftone.co.uk/msg07350.html This message was sent through MyMail http://www.mymail.com.au