Well, another opinion is always welcome. I realize that absence of dust removal system will cost me some time doing that manually, but anyway this choice cannot be considered as mistake. I've heard good opinions about FARE more then once, but apparently noticeable wider dynamic range would be more important for me due to shooting slides mostly and especially liking night and twilling scenery.
Would the FS4000 match the SS4000 in this regard I wouldn't hesitate. Regards, Alex Z -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tom Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: filmscanners: Canon 4000 ppi film scanner > I'm still at this junction struggling between choosing SS4000 or > FS4000, although for about 90% settled for SS4000. I do not want to say that FS4000 is better choice but IMO scanner without infrared channel is just a mistake. You will spend hours on dust and scratches removing. Tom __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com
