No jawed, I must be miss your posting. Would you please to remind me the links ? Was the IV ED sued to that test ?
Regards, Alex Z -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jawed Ashraf Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] RE: LS4000 vs IV ED Alex, did you download the TIFF files from the comparisons I posted of single- and multi-pass scans? Jawed > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex Zabrovsky > Sent: 09 January 2002 22:55 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [filmscanners] LS4000 vs IV ED > > > Considering the IV ED to be acquired in near future I just realized it > hasn't multi-sample scanning ability offered by LS-4000 and some other > models. > The question is how this feature contributes to the scanning > quality in real > life. Do you really notice the difference between regular, one-pass result > and those from multi-sampling ? > Will I really miss this ability scanning either prints or slides ? > > Additional questions: > Is the IV ED multi-pass enabled (as an opposite to multi-sampling) > (at least with Vuescan) ? > > Regards, > Alex Z > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > ---------------------- > Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with > 'unsubscribe filmscanners' > or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the > message title or body > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body